automation

A DIFFRACTIVE TRANSVERSAL FRAMEWORK: CRAFTING CARTOGRAPHIES OF PEDAGOGICAL ENCOUNTERS WITH A POSTHUMAN TEACHERBOT

A DIFFRACTIVE TRANSVERSAL FRAMEWORK: CRAFTING CARTOGRAPHIES OF PEDAGOGICAL ENCOUNTERS WITH A POSTHUMAN TEACHERBOT

Written by: Patricia Gibson. Institute of Art, Design + Technology, Dun Laoghaire, Co. Dublin, Ireland

Abstract: t: Cartography as a posthuman method cultivates the creative and critical mapping of relational encounters between human, non-human and material entities. These empirically grounded accounts render the dynamic, intra-connected and inexhaustible possibilities verifiable in educational research practices. However, the current literature cites a number of examples of cartography mapping but provides no clarity as to how such an analytical practice might come about. In this paper, I design a Diffractive Transversal Framework to guide the cartographies in my research project where 21 interactive media students collectively author a story with(in) Flors the Teacherbot. The purpose of the framework is threefold: to limit the thresholds of encounter in an ethical and sustainable way; the multiperspectival nature of the framework acknowledges material entities; and transdisciplinarity draws from theory traversing multiple disciplines to become philosophically, educationally, and politically driven. A selected cartography charts the qualitative shift in student understandings around knowledge and its creation. Here, the students diffractively analyse how the collective story came about, rather than its meaning, through structured reflective dialogue enacted with(in) Flors. This is a novel approach to research in automated teaching and demonstrates how the method of cartography can be used to analyse digital data from a posthuman perspective.

Keywords: cartography, transversality, diffraction, new materialism, posthuman critical theory, automation

CONSENT AS “FEELING-WITH”: EVERYDAY AUTOMATION AND ONTOLOGIES OF CONSENT IN A COMMUNITY TECHNOLOGY CENTRE

CONSENT AS “FEELING-WITH”: EVERYDAY AUTOMATION AND ONTOLOGIES OF CONSENT IN A COMMUNITY TECHNOLOGY CENTRE

Written by: Suzanne Smythe, Gwénaëlle André, and Nathalie Sinclair. Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada

Abstract: In this article we investigate how automation structures consent for people, and the pedagogies that might expand or reframe consent, both in research contexts and on digital platforms. We do so as researchers involved with adults who attend a bi-weekly drop in “computer support” café, many of whom are new to computers even as their lives are increasingly organized by automated agencies. We think with theories (Jackson and Mazzei 2012) of Indigenous relationalities (Maynard and Simpson 2022), feminist approaches to sexual consent (Consentful Tech Project 2020; Siggy 2021; Ward 2019); and concepts of individuation and technicity (Simondon 1958; 2005) to explore what consent might entail if it returned to its etymological origins of consent, or feeling-with. In keeping with the theory-as-method approach we re-imagine two modes of consent, that of our university’s informed consent protocol for researchers, and the consent protocol for a government sponsored electronic ID. We find that both converge in the logics of corporate platform design that incentivize “epistemologies of ignorance” (Bhatt and MacKenzie 2019). We conclude with speculations upon how con-sent as feeling-with might be re-animated in research methods, design and pedagogy that foreground ethical relationality.

Keywords: Meaningful consent, feeling-with, platform design, automation, digital literacy, theory as method